Peer Review Process

Journal  Pharmademica maintains the standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the Mitra Bestari/ peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by Double-Blind Preview Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects.


All research articles published in Journal  Pharmademica  undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:

  1. All research articles are reviewed by at least one suitably qualified experts with blind review.
  2. All publication decisions are made by the journals’ Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided
  3. Members of the national Editorial Boards lend insight, advice and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief generally and to assist decision making on specific submissions
  4. Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows Journal Pharmademica to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers and editors alike.
  5. Editors of Journal Pharmademica decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals.
  6. Journal  Pharmademica  additionally benefit through the manuscript referral process from the high quality peer review conducted by established journals.